Missouri Corn Growers header image

Missouri Growers Defend Ethanol In EPA Hearing

Posted on 12/6/13

(JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.)–Missouri corn, cattle and ethanol producers traveled to Washington, D.C., yesterday to testify during an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hearing on the proposed 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) rule. Released Nov. 15, the proposal would reduce conventional biofuel requirements, mostly sourced from corn-based ethanol, from the statutorily required 14.4 billion gallons to 13 billion gallons.

The Missouri delegation’s message: Don’t Mess With the RFS.

“In my area of the world, homegrown renewable fuels have not just helped the agricultural economy, but given us a new sense of prosperity,” Missouri Corn Growers Association Board Member Jay Schutte, a corn and livestock farmer from Benton City, Mo., said in his testimony. “I am here today to ask that the RFS be kept in place and that the volume levels that were first put in place be kept.”

Adopted by Congress in 2005 and expanded in 2007, the RFS calls for increasing amounts of low carbon renewable fuel to be blended into our nation’s fuel supply over time, reaching 15 billion gallons by 2015. The RFS was designed to reduce dependence on foreign oil and increase the nation’s renewable fuel supply. This proposed reduction would put 2014 requirements below 2013 levels and reduce demand for corn by nearly 500 million bushels.

“I could be working on the farm today, but thought it was more important to come to Washington, D.C., because I support ethanol and have seen how important the RFS is to all of agriculture and to America,” Dwayne Schad, a corn and livestock producer from Versailles, Mo., said during his testimony. “Reducing the demand for corn in a record crop year will have a devastating impact on our communities.”

Reduced demand for ethanol could also affect Missouri’s six farmer-owned ethanol plants.

“While Show Me Ethanol provides employment to 38 individuals, the number of families dependent on our production is much greater,” testified Rich Hanson, Show Me Ethanol general manager. “The local truck drivers moving products to and from our facility, and the employees of the local elevator supplying our corn, as well as all the farm families in the area that grow corn to support our production all depend on us to help provide a livelihood in rural Missouri.”

Hanson continued, “Not only does ethanol lower the cost of fuel consumed by each of us in our daily transportation, it also provides price support for the agricultural economy that is the heart and soul of the United States. The EPA did a wonderful thing by putting in place the RFS, reducing the dependence on foreign oil and providing an opportunity for a clean domestic renewable fuel source. By taking a step backward, you are sending a signal that the government no longer supports the production of biofuels. Making changes to the mandated volumes takes away incentive for business such as ours to expand and will create challenges for some to even continue operating.”

Missouri’s delegation also noted the potential impact on consumers if levels are dropped to 13 billion gallons.

“I sit on the board of a local bank and have seen the rural revitalization occurring in our area due to ethanol production,” noted David Durham of Norborne, Mo. “Better paying jobs at the plants, more jobs in the suppliers to the plants and more retail businesses. In this tight economy, we also see more people coming in to borrow money just to pay their heating or electricity bill. These are the people who will suffer the most when they have to pay 40-50 cents per gallon more to fill up their car because it is not blended fuel.”

Other individuals and groups testifying in the over 12-hour hearing included: Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, the Renewable Fuels Association, Growth Energy, National Biodiesel Board, American Petroleum Institute, Biotechnology Industry Organization and the American Coalition for Ethanol. The National Corn Growers Association, along with corn growers from 12 other state corn associations also weighed in. A final rule from the EPA is expected in February. The Missouri Corn Growers Association will remain engaged and continue fighting to ensure requirements are restored to their intended levels.

Learn more about the importance of ethanol to Missouri and tell the EPA, “Don’t Mess With the RFS,” at http://cattleandcorn.org/.

- 30 -

Becky Frankenbach
Director of Communications
Missouri Corn Growers Association
(573) 893-4181
bfrankenbach@mocorn.org

Share this page via:

5 comments on “Missouri Growers Defend Ethanol In EPA Hearing”

  1. I to not feel the EPA should cut the standard on how much ethanol will be produced/blended in 2013 by 1.4 billion gallons. You are allowing this due to very strong lobbying by big oil. I feel administration is turning it’s back on renewable energy if you allow this to pass. American farmer grown ethanol has worked in reducing our dependence in foreign oil and has greatly decreased greenhouse gas emissions.

  2. I see no reason to lower the RFS in a year with such an abundant corn supply. Not only does ethanol help the economy in rural areas, but it helps our nation’s economy. Also ethanol help’s to stabilize the price of fuel for the American people. I see no positive gains for our nation by lowering the RFS. When rural community’s thrive the nation thrives.

  3. With corn prices at or near cost of production we can not loose any demand for corn in the coming years due to the reduction of ethanol requirements, the price of gas will probably go up if the amount renwable fuels lowered. thanks for listing. DFE,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. *Fields are required.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.